Pay in installments of $99.88 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 31 - Aug 5
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Stiga Benzin-Schneefräse ST 4262 PDie STIGA ST 4262 P ist eine zuverlssige zweistufige Schneefrse, die sich optimal fr bis zu 50 cm hohen Schnee auf mittelgroen bis groen Flchen wie Wegen, Brgersteigen und Parkpltzen eignet. Dank des 212 cm STIGA Motors und der Frsschnecke mit 62 cm kann dieses Gert auch zusammengepressten Schnee bewltigen und ber den Auswurf auswerfen. Alle Hebel (zum Steuern der Auswurf, des Deflektors und der Geschwindigkeit) befinden sich auf dem praktischen
Die STIGA ST 4262 P ist eine zuverlässige zweistufige Schneefräse, die sich optimal für bis zu 50 cm hohen Schnee auf mittelgroßen bis großen Flächen wie Wegen, Bürgersteigen und Parkplätzen eignet. Dank des 212 cm³ STIGA-Motors und der Frässchnecke mit 62 cm kann dieses Gerät auch zusammengepressten Schnee bewältigen und über den Auswurf auswerfen. Alle Hebel (zum Steuern der Auswurf, des Deflektors und der Geschwindigkeit) befinden sich auf dem praktischen Bedienfeld. 14"-Snow Hog-Räder sorgen für eine gute Bodenhaftung. Dank der zwei auswechselbaren Kufen (aus Metall/HDPE) kann das Gerät auch auf empfindlicheren Oberflächen verwendet werden. Die Geschwindigkeit des ST 4262 P kann über 6 Vorwärts- und 2 Rückwärtsgänge angepasst werden.
Vorteile
- Zweistufiger Schneetransport: Der Schnee wird über die Frässchnecke auf die dahinter liegende Schneeschleuder transportiert und von dieser dann durch den Auswurfkamin an die gewünschte Stelle ausgeworfen.
- Das Förderschneckengehäuse aus Stahl macht diese Schneefräse besonders robust langlebig.
- Die OHV Bauart des Motors sorgt für eine lange Lebensdauer des Motors, sparsamen Kraftstoffverbrauch und insgesamt optimierte Leistung
- Räder mit speziellem Winterprofil, die unter allen Bedingungen und auf schlammigem oder eisigen Untergrund eine hervorragende Traktion bieten
Technische Daten
| Motor & Ausstattung | |
| Marke Motor | Stiga |
| Motorbezeichnung | WS 210 |
| Motor-Bauart | 4-Takt OHV Benzinmotor mit um 25° geneigtem Zylinder in Gußeisen-Buchse mit horizontaler Kurbelwelle |
| Motorleistung | 4,4 kW / 6,0 PS bei 3600 U/Min |
| Hubraum | 212 cm³ |
| Motorstart | Elektrostart |
| Art der Motorschmierung | Spritzschmierung |
| Kraftstofftank | 3,0 Liter |
| Öltank | 0,6 Liter |
| Fräsfunktion | |
| Frässtufen | zweistufig |
| Räumbreite | 62 cm |
| Räumhöhe | 51 cm |
| Wurfweite max. | 8 m |
| Material des Fräsgehäuses | Stahl |
| Räumschnecke Durchmesser | 30 cm |
| Material der Schneeschleuder | Stahl |
| Überlastschutz | Scherbolzen |
| Material Auswurfkanal | Stahl |
| Material Auswurfdeflektor | Stahl |
| Drehbereich Auswurfkamin | 190 ° |
| Verstellung Auswurfkamin | manuell |
| Ausstattung | |
| Griff | Einhandgriff |
| Reifenprofil | Snow Hog |
| Getriebe | |
| Fahrwerk | Räderfahrwerk |
| Anzahl Gänge (V/R) | 6/2 |
| Antriebssystem | Radantrieb über Getriebe |
| Reifengröße | 14" x 5,00 - 6 Snow Hog |
| Lieferumfang | |
| Bedienungsanleitung Gerät | 1 |
| Grundgerät | 1 |
| Umwelt, Maße und Gewicht | |
| garantierter Schallleistungspegel | 107 dB(A) |
| Länge | 148 cm |
| Breite | 62 cm |
| Höhe | 104 cm |
| Gewicht | 90 kg |
| gemessener Schallleistungspegel dB(A) | 104 dB(A) |
| Vibrationswert Handgriff links | 4,14 m/s2 |
| Vibrationswert Handgriff rechts | 5,39 m/s2 |
| Schalldruckpegel am Ohr der Bedienperson | 88 dB(A) |
| Garantie bei privater Nutzung | 2 Jahre |
| Garantie bei gewerblicher Nutzung | 1 Jahre |
| Artikel-Nr. / EAN | |
| Artikel-Nr.: | 18-2841-31 |
| EAN: | 8008984502512 |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 21 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Florida resident and I LOVE THIS... for kids too! HIGHLY RECOMMEND!
Honest review here.
We live in Florida so I have tried a lot of sunscreens and this is my new favorite stick... HIGHLY RECOMMEND. It goes on smoothly and is a thin but white formula. So it shows up and blocks sun but it isn't so thick that it is annoying.
Our family spends a lot of time at the beach and outside in the sun. Sun protection is something we take very seriously.
I always require SPF 50 and I like a solid block that has Zinc Oxide. So that limits my choices b/c it has to have 50 plus the ZO.
I love that this is hypoallegenic (b/c some of them can contain toxic materials that are highly allergic especially for children).
My favorite feature is that it is PABA, phthalates, fragrances, parabens, dyes, alcohol and oxybenzone.
HIGHLY RECOMMEND!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 1, 2020
★★★★★ 5
Convenient non-toxic option
Exactly what I was looking for. Non-toxic convenient option for sunblock. I keep one in my purse, our outdoor bag and in the car. Rubs in easy no weirdness. We are light complected so I'm not sure if it would leave white cast on a darker skin tone. I use it daily on my face, ears and hands.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 4, 2026
★★★★★ 3
Mineral sunscreen stick review - poor at blending
I’m writing a review for this product as well as a number of other mineral sunscreen sticks (MSS) after testing a bunch of them—scroll down to point #6 below if you want to know which one I thought was the best. I’ve placed this exact review on every single other MSS I used. I specifically elected to go with mineral-based sunscreens—lots of talk on the environmental effects of the other sunscreens (not sure how much of this is actually true, but I’m willing to avoid the non-mineral sunscreens given the minimal investment on my part). Here are a few important points about this review:
1. No one paid me to write this review. I put down my own $140 to get all 13 of these MSSs. I just wanted to find the best one by limiting as much bias as possible. Yes, my wife definitely gave me the you’re-crazy-but-I-guess-I’m-stuck-now look.
2. Quick sunscreen tutorial. Most dermatologists say we should try to get an SPF of 30+. Each 1% of zinc counts for 1.6 SPF, so to hit SPF 30, your zinc has to be 18.75%+. Each 1% of titanium counts for 2.6 SPF, so a combination of zinc and titanium could get you to SPF 30 as well. Titanium apparently isn’t good enough to block UV-A (cancer causing and photo-aging) light on its own, so you must add zinc to it. I calculated the SPF based on the stated zinc and titanium percentages on the label and these calculations were usually different from the quoted SPFs (they might be adding more SPFs from other ingredients, but I can’t say for sure). Nine of the 13 MSSs had calculated SPFs 30+. Only 4 of the 13 had a calculated SPF greater than or equal to the label SPF.
3. Because I can’t judge cancer prevention or aging blockade in the short term, avoiding burns and eye irritation are the most important immediately observable elements of an MSS. Every MSS I tested did equally well in burn avoidance and eye irritation avoidance.
4. It should be noted that I’m not Caucasian, I’m South Asian. If you don’t know what that is exactly, Wikipedia it or watch some Russell Peters standup comedy (his old stuff, not his new stuff). My skin color is probably similar to that of Benjamin Bratt (mind you, we’re talking about his skin color only… I’m not even in the same galaxy of overall looks as he is, much to my wife’s chagrin). The ability of a white-colored MSS to blend is crucial for me. And yes, even brown people like me need sunscreen. It would absolutely suck for me as a South Asian to have a higher risk of heart disease, diabetes, and hypertension, skillfully dodge those bullets with diet and exercise and luck, only to get taken out by skin cancer.
5. I like most scents. It seems like so many things are going unscented now—an MSS that is truly unscented is okay, but a lot of things labeled “unscented,” actually have an odd, unpleasant (sort of like bad oatmeal) smell to them. The scent score is logged as a “3” if it’s truly unscented, a “5” if it has a great scent, and a “1” if it smells bad.
6. Here’s the final conclusion. Only 3 of the 13 MSSs I tested had the following combination of characteristics: calculated SPF 30+, smell score 3+, and blend score 4+. These top three were: Neutrogena Sheer Zinc, Aveeno Positively Mineral, and Blue Lizard. When you factor in cost, it’s a no-brainer—Neutrogena and Aveeno were only half the cost of Blue Lizard. Therefore, my two winners (tied for first place) are Neutrogena Sheer Zinc and Aveeno Positively Mineral. Honorable mention for Blue Lizard—twice as expensive as the others, but might be slightly easier to maneuver on your face given the smaller size stick (this is a stretch compliment for Blue Lizard—I think NSZ and APM are just better).
Hope this helps you select your next mineral sunscreen stick!
A^2
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 12, 2020
★★★★★ 5
Muy práctico
Este protector solar es muy bueno es orgánico y a pesar q es pequeño rinde mucho y protege mucho es muy práctico usarlo en barra
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 24, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Perfect for the melanin-less crowd!
Style: SPF 15, Size: 8 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
This is my go to brand. I’m pasty white and burn easily, but not with this! It’s long lasting and smells great too!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 5, 2026