Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 14 - Jul 19
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
TU509M SKFTechnische Basisdaten Gewicht: 1686 Gramm Herstellungsland: Serbien Zolltarifnummer: 8483 3032 Erweiterte technische Daten 1 4 28 SAE LT: Gewinde des Schmiernippels 101 mm Abstand zwischen Haltenutenbden 144 mm Gesamtlnge 17. 5 mm ueres Breitenma der Haltenut 29 mm Durchmesser Fuschraubenloch 49 mm Gesamtueres Breitenma 6. 5 mm Durchmesser der Kopfbereichs des Schmiernippels 7 mm Schlsselweite fr Schmiernippel 83 mm Lnge der Haltenut Beschichtung Ohne
Technische Basisdaten
| Gewicht: 1686 Gramm |
| Herstellungsland: Serbien |
| Zolltarifnummer: 8483 3032 |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| 1/4-28 SAE-LT: Gewinde des Schmiernippels |
| 101 mm Abstand zwischen Haltenutenböden |
| 144 mm Gesamtlänge |
| 17.5 mm Äußeres Breitenmaß der Haltenut |
| 29 mm Durchmesser Fußschraubenloch |
| 49 mm GesamtÄußeres Breitenmaß |
| 6.5 mm Durchmesser der Kopfbereichs des Schmiernippels |
| 7 mm Schlüsselweite für Schmiernippel |
| 83 mm Länge der Haltenut |
| Beschichtung Ohne |
| Einzelgewicht 1.66 kg |
| Nachschmierbohrung Für |
| Schmiernippel Für |
| UNSPSC-Code 31171536 |
| eClass-Code 23-05-08-02 |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 525 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 1
Frame too short
Color: Beige, Size: 132in-Large Metal Base
Can’t be assemble due to the frame being too short
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 20, 2026
★★★★★ 5
great room divider
This room divider is very nice, good fabric, blocks light, not entirely bit alot for my needs. covers or blocks
what i dont want others to see, the assembly was some difficulty but he end product is fantastic.. i recommend fully.. thank you for a great product
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 25, 2024
★★★★★ 4
Offers Complete Privacy
Color: Black, Size: 132in-Large Metal Base
We tried others that were nice but this particular room divider adds total privacy. We were looking for that. Easy to assemble. There is no gap if you position each petition close enough. The guality is very nice. Exactly what we were looking for.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 24, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Versatile Room Divider With Easy Assembly and Strong Coverage
Size: 3 Panel 12FT W
I picked up this Siebwin 3-panel folding room divider mainly for privacy and room separation, and overall it works very well.
Assembly is very straightforward, and the divider can be set up, taken apart, and stored without much effort. The fabric quality feels good, and the frame construction is stronger and more stable than expected. The support tubes especially feel well built and help keep the divider standing securely.
One feature I really liked is the flexibility of the design. The panels can be used together as a complete divider or separated depending on the setup and available space. That makes it much more versatile for different room layouts or temporary privacy needs.
The coverage is also very good, and the size matches the manufacturer’s description accurately. The fabric blocks light and background visibility well enough to provide solid privacy without feeling overly heavy. The wider feet also help improve stability compared to thinner folding dividers.
Another positive detail is that everything arrived complete with no missing parts or damaged pieces, which made assembly much easier and faster.
Compared to cheaper privacy screens, this one feels more durable and easier to customize depending on the situation. In terms of value for the money, it feels like a very practical and worthwhile purchase considering the size, flexibility, and build quality.
Overall, a versatile and well-built room divider with easy assembly, strong privacy coverage, stable construction, complete included parts, flexible panel configuration, and excellent everyday functionality.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 27, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Stable, flexible in deployment configuration, creates true privacy and looks great.
Size: 3 Panel 12FT W
This is the second room divider panel I have installed, and there are several features about this one that I like much better than my older one.
The fact that there are no gaps and that the material is thicker means you get more privacy or more hiding power, if you wish. My older divider has vertical spaces between each of the panels and the panels are half as wide as the Siebwin panels, so there are many vertical spaces. The Siebwin divider really creates privacy.
Another feature that I really appreciate is that the legs are wider and stand off from the floor. On my older one the legs are flat and they're rather awkward to adjust because they create more drag on the floor. The feet on the older one also loosen if you turn them counter clockwise, so adjustments of configuration that require the feet to be moved are more complex.
The older divider also must be deployed in a zig-zag fashion because he feet are not as wide, but this new one can be deployed and stable in a straight, an "N" shape or an arc. They are both the same length, but because the older one must be use in a zig-zag deployment it doesn't reach to the length of the new one.
The Siebwin divider definitely costs more at $103.48, but it sports several features and advantages over the other brand, so it does a better job and is worth the extra cost.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 25, 2026