Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 12 - Jul 17
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
新台澎 澎湖點心 零食系列 Shin Tai Peng Snack(10) "" : : : 30 (450g) (450g) (450g) """""""""" "" ! : : : 30 : ()(200g) + : : 30 (19) Q : 19 : : (10) Q "" ? "" 5 : : :
⚠️易碎商品，請自行評估再下單訂購，謝謝
→【限量】酥蛋燒(10入)
・蛋奶素
・太過熱銷導致經常性的缺貨
・獨立單包裝、不沾手、不容易掉屑非常方便食用
・不太甜、有著淡淡的奶香
・尾韻有著蜂蜜的香氣
・太過熱銷導致經常性的缺貨
・獨立單包裝、不沾手、不容易掉屑非常方便食用
・不太甜、有著淡淡的奶香
・尾韻有著蜂蜜的香氣
商品介紹
本商品為"非常熱賣"的品項
產品規格
過敏原資訊: 本產品含有麩質之穀物及其製品和大豆，對其過敏體質者不宜食用。
產地: 臺灣
保存方式: 置於陰涼處保存勿受陽光照射；開封後請密封保存並儘速食用完畢。無添加防腐劑，最佳賞味期限30天。
→【必買】鹹餅(450g)
泉利餅舖｜大包｜葷 (450g)
泉利餅舖｜大包｜素 (450g)
包裝形式分成"紙盒裝"、"大包"、"單包裝"；"紙盒"和"大包"內為散裝餅乾。
★ 澎湖最具代表性的伴手禮之一
★ 口感酥脆，佐以蔥丁和胡椒的香氣，另外有沒加蔥的素食可供選擇
★ 推薦新吃法：大部分的人都搭配茶享用，但小老闆娘覺得搭配牛奶更能顯出鹹餅的鹹香，推薦試試看喔！
★ 口感酥脆，佐以蔥丁和胡椒的香氣，另外有沒加蔥的素食可供選擇
★ 推薦新吃法：大部分的人都搭配茶享用，但小老闆娘覺得搭配牛奶更能顯出鹹餅的鹹香，推薦試試看喔！
商品介紹
▲說到鹹餅大家通常都是想到要配茶推薦大家也可以搭配"牛奶" 一起吃，會一口接一口喔!
產品規格
▲過敏原資訊: 本產品含有麩質之穀物及其製品和芝麻，不適合其過敏體質者食用
▲保存方式: 置於陰涼處保存勿受陽光照射；開封後請密封保存並儘速食用完畢。最佳賞味期限:30天
▲產地: 台灣 澎湖
→鹹餅＋花生酥(單包裝)(200g)
・一包給您兩種澎湖最具代表性的伴手禮
・鹹餅+花生酥、有鹹有甜好吃不膩口
・都是單包裝好吃不沾手、非常適合朋友分享
・另外也有分開販售鹹餅和花生酥
・鹹餅+花生酥、有鹹有甜好吃不膩口
・都是單包裝好吃不沾手、非常適合朋友分享
・另外也有分開販售鹹餅和花生酥
商品介紹
【鹹餅＋花生酥】先鹹後甜最完美的組合！
產品規格
過敏原資訊
- 鹹餅含有麩質之穀物及其製品和芝麻，不適合其過敏體質者食用。
- 花生酥含有花生及其製品和芝麻，不適合其過敏體質者食用。
產地: 臺灣澎湖
保存方式: 置於陰涼處保存勿受陽光照射；開封後請密封保存並儘速食用完畢。無添加防腐劑，最佳賞味期限30天。
→仙人掌果凍條(約19條)
新臺澎海產總匯 ・使用生長在澎湖野外的仙人掌果肉，經過繁複的手工取出裡面的啞巴刺，經過熬煮濃縮之後，再拿來做果凍條
・軟Q的口感、酸酸甜甜的滋味，冰過以後更好吃！
・軟Q的口感、酸酸甜甜的滋味，冰過以後更好吃！
商品介紹
常溫保存但冰過更好吃喔！
產品規格
產品資訊: 約19條。
保存方式: 置於陰涼處保存勿受陽光照射；開封後請密封保存並儘速食用完畢。
產地: 台灣
注意事項
- 商品內容物以實物為準，商品大小和顏色可能因各顯示器設定而有差異。
- 請細嚼慢嚥，勿整粒一口吞食。兒童及老人食用時，請多加注意。
→手工冬瓜糕(10入)
・外皮酥脆，內餡料Q彈好口感，重點是甜的剛剛好
・冬瓜糕是 澎湖人共同的年節記憶
・ 闆娘推薦新吃法：烤箱加熱後外皮更香酥，而內餡顯得更軟
・冬瓜糕是 澎湖人共同的年節記憶
・ 闆娘推薦新吃法：烤箱加熱後外皮更香酥，而內餡顯得更軟
商品介紹
冬瓜糕葷的和素的最主要是差在"油"
素食的是使用芥花油；葷的是使用豬油
很多人問闆娘哪個好吃?
當然是葷的啊！因為豬油肯定比較香的，但如果想要清爽一點就選擇"素食"。
最後，如果有烤箱真的很建議簡單烤個5分鐘
外皮會更加酥脆，加熱過的內餡會變得溫暖且綿密
相信我一次烤兩顆，不然會不夠吃呢！
產品規格
過敏原資訊: 本產品含本產品含有堅果、芝麻種子、麩質之穀物及其製品、不適合其過敏體質食用。
產地: 臺灣澎湖
保存方式: 置於陰涼處保存勿受陽光照射；開封後請密封保存並儘速食用完畢。
⚠️易碎商品，請自行評估再下單訂購，謝謝
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 81 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
BEST BOOK IN 20 YEARS
Format: Hardcover
BEST BOOK that I have read in 20 years. This should be required reading in Christian schools. Every Christian who has graduated from high school should read this book. As one who has studied Church History, Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek myself, I had become very disappointed in what passes as scholarship, even among Ivy Leage graduates, in the 21st century. HOWEVER, Dr. Pitre's book is a great encouragement that there really are people "out-there" that display genuine scholarship. With Appreciation, Russ Hills, Ph.D.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 13, 2026
★★★★★ 5
A Case for Jesus' Divine Self-Conception
Format: Kindle
This is a very meticulously reasoned argument attempting to show that Jesus had a Divine self-conception. That is, Jesus believed, and claimed, that he was God.
Pitre begins by posing C.S. Lewis’ famous “trilemma” to the reader. If Jesus claimed to be God, we have three ways to respond – he was either a Liar, Lunatic, or Lord. Pitre’s work in this book strives to bring us back, face to face, with this trilemma. To accomplish this, Pitre needs to defeat another popular notion in the modern mind – that Jesus, or at least much of the Gospel material about him, was a “Legend.” If Pitre can show that Jesus did, in fact, historically claim Divinity, we will be forced to respond to his claim and answer Jesus’ own question for ourselves – “Who do you say that I am?”
To accomplish this Pitre first attempts to show that the Gospels are historically reliable. He believes that, contrary to modern scholarly opinion, the Gospels were indeed written by the authors they have been attributed to (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John), that they were intended to portray historically accurate biographical pictures of Jesus, and that they were written much more closely to the time of Jesus than liberal scholars assume (Pitre tentatively dates the synoptic Gospels all before the destruction of the Temple in AD 70). These three pieces of evidence – authorship, intent, and dating – all lead Pitre to the conclusion that the Gospels give us historically accurate information about Jesus.
After setting the stage by arguing for the accuracy of our sources, Pitre delves into the synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) and tries to show that although it is not always explicit (i.e. Jesus doesn’t say “I am God, worship Me.”) even the synoptics portray Jesus as claiming Divinity. Using evidence such as Jesus’ use of the titles “Son of Man” and “I Am,” prophesy from the book of Daniel, Jesus’ “stilling of the storm,” the transfiguration, the pronouncement of the forgiveness of the parlytic’s sins, the riddle about the Son of David being David’s “Lord,”, the crucifixion, and the resurrection, Pitre makes his case. In the end, he believes that not only do the Gospel authors portray Jesus as Divine, but that these claims came from Jesus himself.
Thus we are led, full circle, back to the trilemma. We can call Jesus Liar, Lunatic, or Lord, but not, according to Pitre, a Legend.
This was a really interesting read from a conservative scholar. His exegesis of many Gospel passages illuminate how the Hebrew Scriptures provide a much needed backdrop for understanding each story. The Gospels are much more nuanced than we might first think and oftentimes one saying or image may evoke whole passages or concepts from the Old Testament that would have been apparent to early Jewish readers. As Pitre argues, understanding the Jewish context of the synoptic authors helps in understanding their Christology.
In the end, I agree with Pitre that the Gospels are generally more historically accurate than “mainstream” scholars give them credit for. I think it’s plausible that the Gospel titles reveal their true authors and that they were written fairly early after Jesus’ death (before the fall of Jerusalem). I also agree that the Synoptics may implicitly ascribe Divinity to Jesus – although I don’t think that is an open and shut case. If there were more explicit cases in the synoptic Gospels where Jesus claimed Divinity, it would help his case. It still seems to me the only explicit sayings we have come from the Gospel of John, which even Pitre doesn’t seem to argue is historically reliable (at least he doesn’t focus on this in the book).
It’s probably outside the scope of this book, but I would have loved to see Pitre address the idea of Jesus as Apocalyptic Prophet. He interacts with several scholars who accept this notion (EP Sanders, Dale Allison, Bart Ehrman, John Meier) and it’s a viable option in the world of Historical Jesus scholarship. I think it’s a relevant topic in all discussions surrounding a Historical Jesus and can be a large factor in how one answers the question of Jesus’ identity.
This study is worth reading regardless of your theological persuasion, and Pitre’s arguments deserve serious consideration.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 3, 2016
★★★★★ 5
Relief for dry mouth without gum irritation
Big improvement for users with sensitive gums. These relieve dry mouth during the night almost as well as the regular tabs. Some complained about a residual gel left on the gums. 🙄Just wipe it off. It’s a small thing.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 4, 2026
★★★★★ 5
An easy fix for dry mouth
Excellent for dry mouth.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 6, 2026
★★★★★ 1
This version doesn’t work
I used these 2 nights in a row. I was hoping Oracoat found a solution to the problem people like me have with the regular Xylimelts: irritation of gums. As others have noted the “sensitive” version doesn’t melt and the goo that remains can be difficult to remove. I didn’t have too much trouble after the first night. However, the second day after use, it was so hard to get the remains out, I wound up with a very sore spot from digging it out. I will toss the rest.
It’s too bad this effort fizzled. I hope Oracoat will find a solution For sensitive mouths. In the b meantime, I will use the original for a few nights and then stop before repeating. The idea behind the original product is fantastic. Unfortunately this attempt to make it usable for people with sensitive mouths hasn’t worked. Please try again.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 25, 2025