Pay in installments of $43.62 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 3 - Aug 8
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
100-01971-DW5655 Calix® compatible Transceiver DWDM SFP+ 10GBase C-Band Channel DW27 100GHz (1556.56nm, SMF, 80km, LC, DOM)100 01971 DW5655 Calix compatible Transceiver DWDM SFP+ 10GBase C Band Channel DW27 100GHz (1556. 56nm, SMF, 80km, LC, DOM) ATGBICS Calix compatible 100 01971 DW5655 SFP+ 10GBase DWDM form factor network transceiver supports a distance of up to 80km over single mode fibre (SMF) using a wavelength of 1556. 56nm via an LC Duplex connector. This product operates within a commercial temperature range. Digital optical monitoring (DOM) support is also
100-01971-DW5655 Calix® compatible Transceiver DWDM SFP+ 10GBase C-Band Channel DW27 100GHz (1556.56nm, SMF, 80km, LC, DOM)
ATGBICS Calix® compatible 100-01971-DW5655 SFP+ 10GBase-DWDM form factor network transceiver supports a distance of up to 80km over single-mode fibre (SMF) using a wavelength of 1556.56nm via an LC Duplex connector. This product operates within a commercial temperature range. Digital optical monitoring (DOM) support is also present enabling real-time monitoring of the parameters of the fibre optic transceiver.
Our product meets the specification of Calix® 100-01971-DW5655 and we proudly offer a compatibility guarantee and limited lifetime warranty. Our rigorously tested products record a unique traceable serial number and are fully compliant with all MSA (Multi-Source Agreement) and IEEE standards & protocols.
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 11 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Always soft
Size: Medium, Color: Black/Black/Black
Good fit, fast shipping. Love a new sock
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 11, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Size
Size: Medium, Color: Black/Black/Black
Fit true to size
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 12, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Awesome socks
Excellent socks. Very thick and comfortable
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 30, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Nice socks.
Comfortable socks: who could ask for anything more? They seem to be of a nice quality, but I buy socks often so there's a rotation going on. A little pricey, but ankle socks always have that sporty look. Fit well, but kind of thin, which isn't a deal breaker.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 2, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Best socks on the market
Number of Items: 6, Color: Black/Graphite (6-pairs), Size: Medium
I highly recommend purchasing multiple orders of these socks. I used to wear puma socks that had the padding around the arch and were extremely thick (being that my feet are always cold) i wanted something thick again especially during the winter time. I have had these socks for over two months and I can truly say that they were a better purchase than my pumas. They are so thick that wearing even one pair will still fit into my tennis shoes or running shoes but my toes NEVER get cold. I put a lot of wear and tear on them and they have never started tearing on the bottoms like most socks do. Socks usually develop holes or tears from the friction but I wore the same pair over and over again while walking 13+ miles a day and I cannot tell any sign that these are going out on the bottom. I highly recommend purchasing multiple pairs of these socks.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 6, 2023