Pay in installments of $9.45 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 17 - Jul 22
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
nutr2052 inaTechnische Basisdaten Hersteller: INA Synonym: 0095960200000 Auendurchmesser: 52 mm Gewicht: 318 Gramm Zolltarifnummer: 8482 5000 Erweiterte technische Daten A Alteration In Internal Construction. Identical To Old Notation ueres Breitenmae: mm 52,00 ueres Breitenmae:(B) mm 24,00 Drehzahl bei dauerhafter Fettlagerung (n D G) "4200. 0000" ECLASS number 23 05 15 01 ECLASS2 number 23 05 15 01 Einzelgewicht in (kg): 0. 326 Innenmae: mm 20,00 Anschlag
Technische Basisdaten
| Hersteller: INA |
| Synonym: 0095960200000 |
| Außendurchmesser: 52 mm |
| Gewicht: 318 Gramm |
| Zolltarifnummer: 8482 5000 |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| A Alteration In Internal Construction. Identical To Old Notation |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 52,00 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße:(B) mm 24,00 |
| Drehzahl bei dauerhafter Fettlagerung (n D G) "4200.0000" |
| ECLASS number 23-05-15-01 |
| ECLASS2 number 23-05-15-01 |
| Einzelgewicht in (kg): 0.326 |
| Innenmaße: mm 20,00 |
| Anschlag-Ø Anlaufscheibe: 27 mm |
| C 0r w 44.500 N Statische Tragzahl, radial |
| C r w 31.500 N Dynamische Tragzahl, radial |
| C ur w 5.800 N Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial |
| D 52 mm Außendurchmesser |
| Drehzahl Dauerbetrieb Fettschmierung: 4.200 1/min |
| Dynamische Tragzahl, radial: 31.500 N |
| Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial: 5.800 N |
| F 0r per 44.500 N Zulässige statische rad. Lastaufnahme |
| Minimaler Kantenabstand: 0,5 mm |
| Minimaler Kantenabstand: 1 mm |
| Statische Tragzahl, radial: 44.500 N |
| Zulässige statische rad. Lastaufnahme: 44.500 N |
| d =2 27 mm Anschlag-Ø Anlaufscheibe |
| n D G 4.200 1/min Drehzahl Dauerbetrieb Fettschmierung |
| r 1 min 0,5 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand |
| r min 1 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand |
| ≈m 0,317 kg Einzelgewicht |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.3 ★★★★★
Based on 26 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 1
Slow As a Turtle
Color: 2White
Super slow charging. After 10 minutes, my phone only charged 3%. I plugged my original charging cord into the same 65W charging block and after 2 minutes, it had charged nearly 10%.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 22, 2026
★★★★★ 1
Do not buy, it gets very hot quickly
Color: 2White
I gets hot very fast, bas product I will be returning
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 30, 2026
★★★★★ 1
Slow charge
Color: 2White
Super slow charge takes. Takes almost 2 hours to charge 50%
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 25, 2026
★★★★★ 4
Great & very convenient charger, only one issue
Color: 2Black
This charger wound up being everything I hoped for - it charges a Galaxy S26 fast and works with a wireless charger compatible phone case. Despite all this, I'm taking a star off for the fact that *you have to buy an aftermarket converter* for it, because for some ridiculous reason, its cable end isn't a USB type A (which your previous phone's converters and probably many of your home's outlets use), but requires a 30W (no less) USB-C. So, there goes another $10 for the converter. Actually you'll probably want to buy two, for at least two rooms at your home, so there goes another $20.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 29, 2026
★★★★★ 1
Absolute trash.
Color: 2White
Neither charger worked on arrival... Quite disappointed. Now I'm steering away from every item that has the same markings. Just shelling out for a better quality charger... Not worth it at all... It's incredibly irritating having 2 DoA chargers... Tried on 5 different phones and 10 different blocks.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 16, 2026